Appeal No. 1998-3425
Application 08/502,977
through 6 and 7 on appeal. However, we find nothing in these
prior art references which alters our view as stated above
with regard to the basic combination of Marshall and Wilfong,
that is, the patents to Gluck and Shimasaki do not supply that
which we have found to be lacking in the examiner’s
combination of Marshall and Wilfong. Thus, the examiner’s
rejections of claims 4 through 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 will
likewise not be sustained.
In view of the foregoing, the examiner's decision
rejecting claims 4 through 9 of the present application under
35 U.S.C.
§ 103 is reversed. In addition, the examiner’s decision
rejecting claims 4 through 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, is also reversed.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007