THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DENNIS RONCA and DAVID ALTOPIEDI
____________
Appeal No. 99-0073
Application No. 08/562,1661
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 18 through 20. Claims 10, 11, 14, 16, 21
1Application for patent filed November 22, 1995.
According to the appellants, the application is a divisional
of Application 08/206,638, filed March 7, 1994, now U.S. Pat.
No. 5,514,056.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007