THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DIETER MAUER
________________
Appeal No. 99-0165
Application 08/478,0701
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Dieter Mauer appeals from the final rejection of claims
16 through 21, all of the claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed June 7, 1995. According
to appellant, the application is a division of Application
08/154,649, filed November 18, 1993, now U.S. Patent No.
5,478,051, issued December 26, 1995, which is a division of
Application 07/857,021, filed March 24, 1992, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007