THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KENNETH W. BEEBE
____________
Appeal No. 99-0209
Application No. 08/643,0481
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS
and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1-5, 7-13, 15 and 16, which at that
point constituted all of the claims remaining of record in the
application. Amendments permitted entry after the final
1Application for patent filed May 2, 1996.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007