Appeal No. 99-0210
Application 08/732,285
claimed invention was made, and does not include knowledge
gleaned only from the applicant's disclosure, such a
reconstruction is proper. See In re McLaughlin, 443 F.2d
1392, 1395, 170 USPQ 209, 212 (CCPA 1971). In those cases
where we have sustained the examiner’s rejections, we have
pointed out where suggestion was found in the references or in
the skill that must be attributed to the artisan.
SUMMARY
The rejection of claim 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, is sustained.
The rejection of claims 13-22 and 24-33 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, second paragraph, is not sustained.
The rejection of claims 13, 15, 17-21 and 26 under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b) is sustained.
The rejection of claims 16 and 22-25 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) is not sustained.
The rejection of claim 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
sustained.
The rejection of claims 27-29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
sustained.
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007