Appeal No. 1999-0213 Page 3 Application No. 08/814,550 (2) The compartments (trays) 6, 7, 8, 6', 7', 8' of Vaccaro are not separate from the unitary body of the tool kit (carrier) (brief, pp. 7 to 8). (3) Vaccaro does not disclose “at least one tray extending transversely across each of said front sections and said rear section beneath the level of said center section,” as claimed, because Vaccaro’s compartments are on the same level as the center section (brief, p. 8). We do not agree with arguments (1) and (2). It is fundamental that claims are to be given their broadest reasonable interpretation, and limitations are not to be read into them from the specification. In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 1184, 26 USPQ2d 1057, 1059 (Fed. Cir. 1993). As for argument (1), the top surface of Vaccaro’s front section (with compartments 6, 7, 8) slopes forwardly and downwardly from its rear end to its front end, and the top surface of Vaccaro’s rear section (with compartments 6', 7', 8') slopes rearwardly and downwardly from its front end to its rear end. This is sufficient to meet the language of claim 1, since claim 1 does not specify what part or how much of each of the front and rearPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007