THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES W. SHIEK, SR.
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0266
Application No. 08/290,6781
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 3, 6, 7, 9 to 13 and 18 to 20, which are
all of the claims pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed August 15, 1994. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/023,300, filed February 26, 1993, now
abandoned, which was a continuation of Application No.
07/728,742, filed July 12, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007