Ex parte OKASHITA et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-0279                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/926,986                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants' invention relates to a steering apparatus              
          for an automotive vehicle.  An understanding of the invention               
          can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 5, which                   
          appears in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                           


               The claims on appeal stand rejected on the following                   
          grounds:                                                                    
          (1) Claims 3 through 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph,              
          as the specification fails to adequately teach how to make                  
          and/or use the invention, and                                               
          (2) Claims 3 through 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                        
          paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly                  
          point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the                 
          appellants regard as the invention.                                         


               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and the appellants regarding the above-noted                
          rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (mailed              
          July 16, 1998) for the examiner's complete reasoning in                     









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007