Appeal No. 1999-0347 Page 5
Application No. 08/804,635
(5) Claims 3, 4, 10, 11 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Ball in view of various admissions of prior
art.
Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced
by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted
rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer for the
examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejections,
and to the appellant's brief (Paper No. 12, filed July 24,
1998) and reply brief (Paper No. 14, filed October 20, 1998)
for the appellant's arguments thereagainst.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007