Appeal No. 1999-0524 Application 08/735,228 1) teaches a guide suspension for drawers of a filing cabinet, in particular, that permits the drawers to be moved out of the cabinet from either of the opposite sides thereof. However, for reasons delineated, infra, we are of the opinion that this evidence simply would not have been suggestive of the examiner’s proposed modification. Initially, we note that the examiner has not set forth in the body of the rejection an explanation of the manner in which the Hines vehicle container arrangement would have been modified or altered by one of ordinary skill in the art to thereby effect the content of the claimed invention. Thus, we lack an under- standing of the examiner’s specific basis for the conclusion of obviousness. Nevertheless, it appears to us that any alteration of the vehicle container arrangement of Hines, to bring about a configuration as claimed, would require and entail a major overhaul of the Hines arrangement to the extent that the patentee’s anti-theft objective of an easily accessible bar and lock arrangement positioned outboard and 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007