THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KENT H. FORSLAND
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0611
Application No. 08/814,2721
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 30, which are all of the claims
pending in this application. Claims 5, 12, 15, 19, 24 and 27
were amended after the final rejection in Paper No. 10.
We AFFIRM.
1Application for patent filed March 10, 1997. According to the
appellant, this application is a continuation-in-part of Application No.
08/601,777, filed February 15, 1996, now abandoned, Application No.
29/040,278, filed June 14, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. D 378,421, and Application
No. 29/055,656, filed June 10, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. D 397,447.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007