THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL A. UMNEY and DOUGLAS E. VANN
____________
Appeal No. 99-0612
Application No. 08/772,9581
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS,
and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 5 through 8 and 11 through 16, which
are all of the claims pending in this application. Claims 2
through 4, 9, 10 and 17 were canceled in an amendment after
final rejection filed February 10, 1998.
1Application for patent filed December 24, 1996.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007