Appeal No. 1999-0627 Page 14
Application No. 08/688,991
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 1 and 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and claims 4 through
10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed as to claims 1, 3 through
5 and 8 through 10 but reversed as to claims 6 and 7.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
HARRISON E. McCANDLISH )
Senior Administrative Patent Judge
)
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007