THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEVEN PECK and MATTHEW S. MCMASTER
____________
Appeal No. 99-0630
Application No. 08/633,4001
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT and BAHR, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 3 through 6 and 16. Claims 7 through
15 are objected to as depending from a rejected base claim
1Application for patent filed April 16, 1996.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007