Appeal No. 99-0643 Page 4 Application No. 08/828,225 Capri 3,874,204 Apr. 1, 1975 Nagy 4,732,024 Mar. 22, 1988 The following rejection is before us for review. Claims 10 through 14 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Nagy in view of Capri. The complete text of the examiner's rejection and response to the argument presented by the appellant appears in the answer (Paper No. 22, mailed September 18, 1998), while the complete statement of the appellant's argument can be found in the supplemental brief (Paper No. 21, filed September 9, 1998). OPINION In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given careful consideration to the appellant's specification and claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the respective positions articulated by the appellant and the examiner. As a consequence of our review, we make the determinations which follow. We shall not sustain the rejection of claims 10 through 14 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007