Appeal No. 1999-0930 Application 08/410,931 the respective viewpoints of appellant and the examiner. As a consequence of our review, we make the determinations which follow. We reverse the respective rejections of the claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Initially, we make the following findings relative to the examiner’s evidence of obviousness. The Gueret document discloses an applicator device (Fig. 1) that includes a brush comprising a tuft of hairs 8 carried by a stem 9 and a bottle 2 containing a liquid product L. The stem includes a hollow portion 14 defining a chamber or reservoir R which is capable of replenishment by capillarity when the hairs 8 of the brush are immersed in the liquid product L. The hollow portion 14 comprises capillary striations 18 (Fig. 2) oriented parallel to the axis of the been expected to draw from the disclosure. See In re Preda, 401 F.2d 825, 826, 159 USPQ 342, 344 (CCPA 1968). 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007