THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte MICHAEL J. LYONS __________ Appeal No. 1999-0945 Application 08/786,6651 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 3, 4, 11 and 12, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. Claims 1, 2 and 5 through 10 have been canceled. 1 Application for patent filed January 21, 1997. According to appellant, the application is a continuation of Application 08/369,120, filed January 5, 1995, now abandoned. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007