Appeal No. 99-1479 Application 08/609,991 Rasmussen 5,275,483 Jan. 4, 1994 Claims 14 to 16, 22, 23, 30, 32, 33, 35 and 36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Grass AG. In order for a claim to be anticipated, every limitation thereof must be disclosed, expressly or inherently, in a single prior art reference. In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477, 44 USPQ2d 1429, 1431 (Fed. Cir. 1997). We will therefore first consider whether the limitations of independent claim 14 are disclosed by Grass AG. Reading Grass AG in relation to claim 14, we find that Grass AG discloses a pull-out guide for a drawer 2 in an article of furniture (cabinet) 1, the guide having (i) a supporting runner 3 which is mounted on the furniture body, has upper and lower running flanges at the top and bottom of member 14, and has a running member (roller) 13, and (ii) a pull-out runner 4 which is mounted on the drawer by plate 9 and hook 35 (page 7, lines 4 to 6; page 9, lines 1 to 9), a horizontal fin 18, and a running member 11 which is guided between the upper and lower flanges of member 14. Roller 13 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007