THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte EDWARD K. DRISCOLL,
ARTHUR R. NIGRO
and THOMAS D. FILLIO
__________
Appeal No. 1999-1498
Application 08/547,6041
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before CALVERT, COHEN, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 22,
24 and 28 to 31, all the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed October 24, 1995. According to the appellants,
the application is a continuation of Application 08/191,039, filed February 3, 1994, now
Patent No. 5,490,723, issued February 13, 1996, which is a division of Application
08/080,310, filed June 24, 1993, now Patent No. 5,343,357, issued August 30, 1994, which
is a division of Application 07/935,110, filed August 26, 1992, now Patent No.
5,247,427, issued September 21, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007