THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HANS W. HERZOG, KENNETH B. LINGO and JOHN H. NOLAN
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1524
Application No. 08/938,0511
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, PATE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 to 8, 14, 15, 22, 24 and 26 to 31. 2
Claims 9, 16 to 21, 23, 25 and 32 to 36 have been allowed.
1Application for patent filed September 26, 1997.
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 08/523,061, filed September 1, 1995, now
abandoned.
2Claim 15 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007