THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANK M. LOCOTOS
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1529
Application No. 08/366,9851
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, COHEN and
NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 38, 39 and 41 to 49. Claims 50 to 52
have been objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim.
Claims 2 to 37, 40 and 53 have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed December 30, 1994.
According to the appellant, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 07/765,374, filed September 25, 1991, now
U.S. Patent No. 5,378,087.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007