THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GARWIN B. McNEILUS and WILLIAM P. BARTLETT
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1535
Application No. 08/752,2201
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, MEISTER, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's
rejection of claims 19 through 36, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.2
1Application for patent filed November 19, 1996.
2The appellant canceled claims 1 through 18 and presented
new claims 19 through 36 in an amendment after final rejection
(Paper No. 6, filed May 27, 1998). While the examiner has
approved entry of this amendment upon filing of a Notice of
Appeal and an Appeal Brief (see the Advisory Action, Paper No.
7, mailed June 17, 1998), we note that this amendment has not
(continued...)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007