Appeal No. 1999-1722
Application No. 08/729,602
(2) Claims 13 to 16, Legras in view of Wahlberg and
Gauselmann;
(3) Claim 17, Legras in view of Wahlberg, Gauselmann and
Harlick;
(4) Claim 18, Legras in view of Wahlberg, Gauselmann, Harlick
and Dabrowski ‘696;
(5) Claim 19, Dabrowski ‘728 in view of Wahlberg;
(6) Claim 26, Legras in view of Wahlberg and Dabrowski ‘728.3
3From the examiner’s statement of this rejection in the
answer (page 6), it appears that he intended to apply
Dabrowski ‘696 rather than ‘728, and we have considered the
rejection on that basis.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007