Ex parte MOHR et al. - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                      
                    for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                     
                                                                                                                    Paper No. 16                        
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                             Ex parte KURT MOHR and THOMAS WAGNER                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 1999-1735                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/745,9781                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                       
                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                        
                 rejection of claims 23 to 38, 41 to 45, 47 and 55.  Claims 57                                                                          
                 to 75 have been allowed.  Claims 39, 40, 48 to 54 and 56 have                                                                          
                 been objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim.                                                                                
                 Claims 1 to 22 and 46 have been canceled.                                                                                              



                          1Application for patent filed November 8, 1996.                                                                               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007