THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KURT MOHR and THOMAS WAGNER
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1735
Application No. 08/745,9781
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 23 to 38, 41 to 45, 47 and 55. Claims 57
to 75 have been allowed. Claims 39, 40, 48 to 54 and 56 have
been objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim.
Claims 1 to 22 and 46 have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed November 8, 1996.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007