THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID HAROLD BERRY
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1740
Application No. 08/799,4331
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 to 14. Claim 19 has been allowed.
Claim 15 has been objected to as depending from a non-allowed
claim. Claims 16 to 18 have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed February 13, 1997.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007