Appeal No. 1999-1751 Page 3
Application No. 08/814,299
BACKGROUND
The appellant's invention relates to a device for
transporting workpieces. An understanding of the invention
can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1 and 30,
which appear in the appendix to the examiner's answer.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Laverriere 4,389,064 June 21,
1983
Claeskens et al. 4,480,780 Nov. 6,
1984
(Claeskens)
Hawkswell 4,624,050 Nov.
25, 1986
Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Hawkswell.
Claim 30 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Laverriere.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007