Appeal No. 1999-1754 Application No. 08/800,230 The appellants’ invention is directed to a handle for a fishing rod. The claims before us on appeal have been reproduced in an appendix to the Appeal Brief. THE REFERENCES The references relied upon by the examiner to support the final rejection are: Sleight 2,091,458 Aug. 31, 1937 Strader 4,653,215 Mar. 31, 1987 THE REJECTIONS Claims 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Strader. Claims 3, 5 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Strader. Claims 9 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Strader in view of Sleight. Rather than attempt to reiterate the examiner’s full commentary with regard to the above-noted rejections and the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellants regarding the rejections, we make reference to the 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007