Ex parte KOIDO et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1999-2108                                                                                     Page 2                        
                 Application No. 08/654,371                                                                                                             


                          This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner                                                                           
                 finally rejecting claims 1-5, 10 and 11, which constitute all                                                                          
                 of the claims remaining of record in the application.                                          2                                       
                          The appellants’ invention is directed to a method of                                                                          
                 manufacturing a print head for use with an ink jet printer.                                                                            
                 The claims on appeal have been reproduced in an appendix to the                                                                        
                 Brief.                                                                                                                                 
                                                                THE REFERENCES                                                                          
                          The references relied upon by the examiner to support the                                                                     
                 final rejection are:                                                                                                                   
                 Teshima et all. (Teshima)                             5,593,080                  Jan.14, 1997                                          
                                                                                         (filed Jun. 12,                                                
                 1995)                                                                                                                                  
                 The admitted prior art as described on pages 1-4 and in Figures                                                                        
                 11-13 of the appellants’ specification.                                                                                                

                                                                 THE REJECTION                                                                          
                          Claims 1-5, 10 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                                                                    
                 as being unpatentable over the admitted prior art in view of                                                                           
                 Teshima.                                                                                                                               


                          2  We note that while the examiner indicated in Paper No.                                                                     
                 13 that claim 2 contained allowable subject matter, it                                                                                 
                 nevertheless was not removed from the final rejection.                                                                                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007