Ex parte ROHRINGER et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 99-2124                                                          
          Application No. 08/844,830                                                  

          F.2d 1044, 1052, 5 USPQ2d 1434, 1439 (Fed. Cir.), cert.                     
          denied, 488 U.S. 825 (1988).                                                
               The appellants’ invention is directed to a steering                    
          reaction force control arrangement for a hydraulic servo valve              
          of a power steering system.  During the assembly of such                    
          devices, it is necessary to provide a mechanism for allowing                
          rotational adjustment of a control sleeve and an adjacent                   
          sleeve structure with respect to one another so they are in                 
          proper relationship prior to fixedly attaching them together.               
          In furtherance of this, independent claim 1 requires, inter                 
          alia, a control sleeve and a sleeve structure, each                         
               having cooperating conically shaped adjacent end                       
               portions, one being provided with an outer cone                        
               structure and the other with an inner cone structure                   
               by which they are engaged with one another in an                       
               angular position . . . .                                               
          In operation, the inner and outer cone structures are loosely               
          placed together so that at least one can be rotated until it                
          is in the proper relationship with the other, whereafter they               
          are pressed together to establish a tight fit that precludes                
          relative rotation.                                                          
               The examiner has rejected this claim as being                          
          unpatentable over UK ‘000, which also is directed to a                      

                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007