THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ DAVID H. BEACH Junior Party1 v. ANDREW ARNOLD Senior Party2 __________ Patent Interference No. 103,520 ___________ Before URYNOWICZ, SOFOCLEOUS and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662(a) Beach, the senior party, filed a concession of priority with respect to the subject matter of count 2 and requested therein and agreed to an entry of adverse judgment as to all the claims which correspond to the count in this interference (Paper No. 52). Accordingly, JUDGMENT as to the subject matter of the count in issue is hereby 1 Application 07/963,308, filed October 16, 1992. 2 Application 07/667,711, filed March 11, 1991. 1Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007