BEACH V. ARNOLD - Page 1





                                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                               
                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                                                                                
                     publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                       
                                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                                
                                                                                 __________                                                                                            
                                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                                
                                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                              
                                                                                 __________                                                                                            
                                                                             DAVID H. BEACH                                                                                            
                                                                                 Junior Party1                                                                                         
                                                                                          v.                                                                                           
                                                                           ANDREW ARNOLD                                                                                               
                                                                                 Senior Party2                                                                                         
                                                                                 __________                                                                                            
                                                                 Patent Interference No. 103,520                                                                                       
                                                                                ___________                                                                                            
                     Before URYNOWICZ, SOFOCLEOUS and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                            
                     DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                              

                                                    JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662(a)                                                                                             
                                Beach, the senior party, filed a concession of  priority with respect to the subject                                                                   
                     matter of count 2 and requested therein and agreed to an entry of adverse judgment as to                                                                          
                     all the claims which correspond to the count  in this interference (Paper No. 52).                                                                                
                                Accordingly, JUDGMENT as to the subject matter of the count in issue is hereby                                                                         



                                1 Application 07/963,308, filed October 16, 1992.                                                                                                      
                                2 Application 07/667,711, filed March 11, 1991.                                                                                                        
                                                                                          1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007