THOMAS et al. V. MABRY et al. - Page 2




          Interference No. 103,777                                                    



                    Now comes senior party Mabry et al. with a dis-                   
          claimer of all patent claims designated as corresponding to                 
          the count,                                                                  


          which under 37 CFR § 1.662(a) is to be treated as a request                 
          for entry of adverse judgment.  Accordingly, the following                  
          judgment is entered.                                                        


                                      Judgment                                        
                    Judgment in Interference No. 103,777 is entered                   
          against the senior party, Ronald D. Mabry and Gerald F. Unger.              
          Ronald D. Mabry and Gerald F. Unger are not entitled to their               
          patent containing claims 1 through 29, which claims are desig-              
          nated as corresponding to the count in interference.  Judgment              
          is entered in favor of junior party Paul E. Thomas and Michael              
          A. Francis. Paul E. Thomas and Michael A. Francis are entitled              
          to a patent containing claims 1 through 34, which claims are                
          designated as corresponding to the count in interference.                   





                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007