THIS OPINION WAS WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is binding precedent of the Interference Trial Section of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. The opinion is otherwise not binding precedent. The decision was entered on __________ Paper 29 Filed by: Trial Section Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ NANCY M. GRAY and RAYMOND L. WOOSLEY Junior Party, (Patent 5,474,997), v. JAN HEERES, JEAN L. MESENS and JOZEF PEETERS Senior Party (Application 08/676,531). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,079 _______________ Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and SCHAFER, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges. PER CURIAM. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662Page: 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007