Interference No. 104,181
Background
On August 5, 1999, the Administrative Patent Judge
(APJ) entered an Order to Show Cause under 37 CFR §
1.640(d)(3) against the junior party for failure to allege a
date in its preliminary statement that would overcome the
senior party’s effective filing date. The junior party did
not respond to the Order. Accordingly, the following
judgment is entered.
JUDGMENT UNDER 37 CFR § 1.640
Judgment in Interference No. 104,181 is entered
against David J. Parins and Richard K. Poppe, the junior
party. David J. Parins and Richard K. Poppe are not entitled
to a patent con- taining claims 13 through 17, which claims
correspond to the count in interference. Judgment is entered
in favor of Michael D. Hooven, the senior party. Michael D.
Hooven is entitled to a patent containing claims 4, 8, 9, 16,
17, and 21 through 23, which claims correspond to the count in
interference.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007