THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Trial Section Merits Panel
Box Interference
Filed by:Washington, D.C. 20231 Paper No. 38
Telephone: 703-308-9797
Facsimile: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
GEORGE UHL et al.,
Junior Parties
(Patent Applications 08/188,275
and 08/430,286),
v.
LEI YU,
Senior Party
(Patent Application 08/120,601).
_______________
Consolidated Interference Nos. 104,230 and 104,231
_______________
Before SCHAFER, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
JUDGMENT
(PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.640)
Upon consideration of the record of these consolidated
interferences, particularly the decision granting Yu's
preliminary motion for no interference in fact ('230 Paper
No. 36; '231 Paper No. 29), it is
35 U.S.C. § 135(c) Notice: Failure to file a copy of any agreement regarding the
termination of this proceeding may render the agreement and any resulting patents
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007