TANAHASHI et al. V. WETZEL et al. - Page 2




                 Interference No. 104,376                                                                                                               
                 Tanahashi v. Wetzel                                                                                                                    

                                               Patent Interference No. 104,3763                                                                         
                                                              _______________                                                                           
                 Before:  McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and                                                                             
                 SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                         
                 LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                      
                                                                    Judgment                                                                            
                          On November 4, 1999, junior party Tanahashi filed a                                                                           
                 request for entry of adverse judgment against party Tanahashi.                                                                         
                 (Paper No. 18).  The request is granted.  Accordingly, it is                                                                           
                          ORDERED that judgment as to the count in this                                                                                 
                 interference is awarded against party Tanahashi and in favor                                                                           
                 of party Wetzel;                                                                                                                       
                          FURTHER ORDERED that Masao Tanahashi, Takeshi Shiba, and                                                                      
                 Toshio Ikuta, are not entitled to their patent claim 1 which                                                                           
                 corresponds to the count;                                                                                                              
                          FURTHER ORDERED that on this record, Matthias Wetzel,                                                                         
                 Terence G. Royle, and Raymond G. Parsonage, are entitled to                                                                            
                 their application claims 58-63 which correspond to the count.                                                                          




                          3The notice declaring this interference (Paper No. 1)                                                                         
                 erroneousy indicated the number of this interference as                                                                                
                 103,376.  The correct number is 104,376.                                                                                               
                                                                       - 2 -                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007