Interference No. 103,607
Assar v. Lofgren
final decision in this case and issued an order for senior
party Lofgren to show cause, within twenty (20) days of the
order, as to why judgment should not be entered against senior
party Lofgren on the ground that all of senior party’s claims
corresponding to the count are unpatentable to the senior
party and why senior party Lofgren’s preliminary motion 3
which was not decided in the final decision still need to be
decided (Paper No. 58). Senior party Lofgren responded to the
show cause order in a paper filed on October 25, 1999 (Paper
No. 59), by withdrawing its preliminary motion 3. Henceforth,
the only matter remaining is that of entering judgment in this
proceeding. It is
ORDERED that senior party Lofgren, i.e., KARL M.J.
LOFGREN, ROBERT D. NORMAN, GREGORY B. THELIN, and ANIL GUPTA,
are not entitled to their application claims 33 and 34 which
correspond to the count;
FURTHER ORDERED that on this record, junior party Assar,
i.e., MAHMUD ASSAR, is entitled to patent claims 1-4 and 10-13
which correspond to the count; and
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007