KALMAN et al. V. ADAMS et al. - Page 3

          Interference No. 103,974                                   Page 3           
          Kalman v. Adams                                                             
               FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the record before us,                   
          Adams is entitled to a patent containing claims 26-32 of                    
          Adam's 08/274,608 application.                                              




                            RICHARD E. SCHAFER                                        
                            Administrative Patent Judge                               


                                                               BOARD OF               
                            JAMESON LEE                         PATENT                
                            Administrative Patent Judge       APPEALS AND             
                                                             INTERFERENCES            


                            RICHARD TORCZON                                           
                            Administrative Patent Judge                               























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007