SHUEY V. FUTATSUGI et al. - Page 3




          Interference No. 104,020                                                    



                    Judgment in Interference No. 104,020 is entered                   
          against Joseph B. Shuey, the junior party, on the ground of                 
          priority    of invention.  Joseph B. Shuey is not entitled to               
          his patent claims 1 through 41, which claims correspond to the              
          count in interference.  Judgment is entered in favor of                     
          Takashi Futatsugi and Ikuo Enomoto, the senior party.  Takashi              
          Futatsugi and Ikuo Enomoto are entitled to a patent containing              
          claims 20, 25 through 28 and 31 through 43, which claims                    
          correspond to the count in interference.                                    





                         IAN A. CALVERT               )                               
                         Administrative Patent Judge  )                               
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )   BOARD OF                   
          PATENT                                                                      
                         ANDREW H. METZ               )     APPEALS AND               
                         Administrative Patent Judge  )                               
          INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         WILLIAM F. PATE, III         )                               
                         Administrative Patent Judge  )                               



                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007