THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 59 Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ KARL-HEINRICH SCHULTE-ELTE, CHRISTIAN MARGOT, CHRISTIAN CHAPUIS, DANA P. SIMMONS and DANIEL REICHLIN Junior Party, v. TATSUYA OHMOTO, AKEMI SHIMADA and TAKESHI YAMAMOTO, Senior Party. _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,088 _______________ Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges. PER CURIUM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 Upon consideration of SCHULTE-ELTE ET AL. REQUEST FOR ADVERSE JUDGMENT UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.662 (Paper 58), it isPage: 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007