HONIG et al. V. JENSEN et al. - Page 1





                               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                              
            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written               
            for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.              

                                                                          Paper No. 29                   

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                    
                                            _______________                                              

                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                            _______________                                              

                              MICHAEL L. HONIG and UPAMANYU MADHOW,                                      

                                             Junior Party,1                                              

                                                    v.                                                   

                                            RYAN N. JENSEN,                                              
                          ROBERT C. DIXON, and JEFFREY S. VANDERPOOL,          2                         

                                             Senior Party.3                                              

                                             ______________                                              

                                  Patent Interference No. 104,191                                        
                                             ______________                                              

                                 JUDGMENT UNDER 37 CFR § 1.662(a)                                        
                                             _____________                                               

            METZ, PATE, and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        

              Patent No. 5,481,533, granted January 2, 1996, based on Application1                                                                                      
            Serial No. 08/241,928, filed May 12, 1994.  Assigned to Omnipoint Corporation.               
            Accorded benefit of: none.                                                                   
              When the interference was declared, the inventors of the involved senior2                                                                                      
            party application were Anderson Gary B. Anderson, Ryan N. Jensen, Bryan K. Petch,            
            and Peter O. Peterson.  In paper No. 28, the Administrative Patent Judge (APJ)               
            granted 37 CFR § 1.634 motions changing the inventorship to Ryan N. Jensen, Robert           
            C. Dixon, and Jeffrey S. Vanderpool.  The interference was redeclared accordingly            
            in paper No. 29.                                                                             
              Application Serial No. 08/774,559, filed December 31, 1996.  Assigned to3                                                                                      
            Omnipoint Corporation.  Accorded benefit of the following U.S. Applications:                 
            Serial No. 08/284,053, filed August 1, 1994; Serial No. 08/215,306, filed                    
            March 21, 1994; and Serial No. 08/146,496, filed November 1, 1993.                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007