THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ MICHAEL L. HONIG and UPAMANYU MADHOW, Junior Party,1 v. RYAN N. JENSEN, ROBERT C. DIXON, and JEFFREY S. VANDERPOOL, 2 Senior Party.3 ______________ Patent Interference No. 104,191 ______________ JUDGMENT UNDER 37 CFR § 1.662(a) _____________ METZ, PATE, and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges. Patent No. 5,481,533, granted January 2, 1996, based on Application1 Serial No. 08/241,928, filed May 12, 1994. Assigned to Omnipoint Corporation. Accorded benefit of: none. When the interference was declared, the inventors of the involved senior2 party application were Anderson Gary B. Anderson, Ryan N. Jensen, Bryan K. Petch, and Peter O. Peterson. In paper No. 28, the Administrative Patent Judge (APJ) granted 37 CFR § 1.634 motions changing the inventorship to Ryan N. Jensen, Robert C. Dixon, and Jeffrey S. Vanderpool. The interference was redeclared accordingly in paper No. 29. Application Serial No. 08/774,559, filed December 31, 1996. Assigned to3 Omnipoint Corporation. Accorded benefit of the following U.S. Applications: Serial No. 08/284,053, filed August 1, 1994; Serial No. 08/215,306, filed March 21, 1994; and Serial No. 08/146,496, filed November 1, 1993.Page: 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007