THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper 18
Filed by: Trial Section
Box Interference
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
SURJIT S. CHADHA and CHARLES M. WATKINS,
Junior Party,
(Patent 5,788,881),
v.
HITOSHI TOKI, FUMIAKI KATOAKA,
SHIGEO ITOH and YOSHITAKA SATO,
Senior Party
(Application 08/720,154).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 104,389
_______________
Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PER CURIAM.
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662
Upon consideration of the TOKI REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF
INTERFERENCE (Paper 17), it is
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007