claim 11 and compounds having the formula set out in Katou
claim 19 wherein n is an integer other than 10.
FURTHER ORDERED that nothing in this JUDGMENT UNDER
37 CFR § 1.662(a) should be construed as expressing an opinion
on the patentability of claims to compounds having the formula
set out in Katou claim 11 and compounds having the formula set
out in Katou claim 19 wherein n is an integer other than 10
over either Belko or the prior art reference.
FURTHER ORDERED that should further prosecution by
Katou result in an appeal to the board, Katou shall identify
this interference as a related case.
______________________________
FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
______________________________)
RICHARD E. SCHAFER ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
______________________________)
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 7 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007