THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MOHAMMAD S. MAZHAR ____________ Appeal No. 95-2687 Application No. 08/105,9841 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, KIMLIN, and HANLON, Administrative Patent Judges. HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge. ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING Appellant requests reconsideration of our decision dated August 24, 1999, in the above-identified appeal. According to appellant, the request for reconsideration is a request for clarification of that decision. The request for reconsideration is GRANTED. 1Application for patent filed August, 10, 1993.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007