Appeal No. 1997-1274 Application 08/431,397 For the reasons stated above, Appellants have not persuaded us that we erred in our finding of anticipation. CONCLUSION We have considered Appellants' request to the extent that we have reconsidered our decision of September 3, 1999, but we decline to make any changes therein. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). DENIED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ERIC FRAHM ) Administrative Patent Judge ) - 8 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007