KIPOURAS et al. V. BARNHOUSE et al. - Page 24




          Interference No. 103,029                                                    



          have prevented the senior party from developing evidence to                 
          support an allegation of derivation before the date on which                
          the request to amend the preliminary statement was filed.                   
          First, the senior party points to the stipulations that were                
          filed by the parties on December 23, 1993.  These stipulations              
          were developed and signed by the parties on December 16 and                 
          17, 1993 in order to obviate a motion for additional discovery              
          filed by Barnhouse and withdrawn concurrently with the filing               
          of the stipulations. According to Barnhouse, the stipulations               
          represent the first concrete evidence that the samples used by              
          Federl and Kipouras in the set(s) of experiments as reported                
          in comparative examples C1 to C5 and C10 and as examples 6-9                
          of U.S. Patent 4,588,773 and the set of experiments reported                
          in table VI in KX-15 were the copolymer samples furnished to                
          Borg-Warner via Barnhouse from Goodrich.                                    
                    The following represents our findings of fact with                
          regard to the motions to amend the preliminary statement.                   
          Beginning about 18 months before the filing of the Federl                   
          application, Barnhouse was supplying ECH/EO to Federl and                   




                                          24                                          





Page:  Previous  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007