Interference No. 103,467 (c) a second temple arm or leg hingedly connected, by means of a second hinge, to said front rim; and (d) means for coupling said front section to said rear section of the first temple arm. The claims of the parties that correspond to the count are: Whisenant Claims 1-3, 5-9, and 11-13 Wagner Claims 1-3 Background and Issues to be Decided The interference was declared September 20, 1994. However, the motion period was suspended when it became apparent that neither the Patent and Trademark Office nor the senior party’s attorney of record could locate a current address for the senior party inventor. After the senior party inventor’s address was located through on-line searching, the interference was resumed. The senior party has filed no papers and therefore stands on his effective filing date. The sole issue at final hearing is whether the junior party can antedate the senior 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007