Appeal No. 2000-0027 Page 17
Application No. 09/072,190
For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the
examiner to reject claim 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.
Claims 13 to 19
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 13 to 19
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is also affirmed since the appellant has
not argued separately the patentability of any particular
claim apart from the others, thus allowing claims 13 to 19 to
fall with claim 12 (see In re Young, 927 F.2d 588, 590, 18
USPQ2d 1089, 1091 (Fed. Cir. 1991); In re Wood, 582 F.2d 638,
642, 199 USPQ 137, 140 (CCPA 1978); and 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7)
and (8)(iv)).
4(...continued)
F.2d 792, 794, 215 USPQ 569, 571 (CCPA 1982); In re Pearson,
494 F.2d 1399, 1402, 181 USPQ 641, 644 (CCPA 1974).
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007