Appeal No. 2000-0078
Application No. 08/837,242
ordinary skill in the art.
We therefore will not sustain rejection (4).
Conclusion
The examiner’s decision to reject claims 1, 8, 10, 11, 26
and 29 as anticipated by Miilu under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (b) is
affirmed as to claims 1, 11, 26 and 29, and reversed as to
claims 8 and 10. The examiner’s decision to reject claims 1 to
4, 8 to 14 and 25 to 29 on the various other grounds specified
herein is reversed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
14
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007