Ex parte PETKOVSEK - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 20              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte GLENN PETKOVSEK                                
                                   _____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2000-0107                                  
                               Application 08/905,072                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT and BAHR, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       




                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               Appellant has filed a timely response to our requirement               
          under 37 C.F.R. § 1.196(d), mailed February 4, 2000 (Paper No.              
          18).  In the response, it is stated that the appellant, Glenn               
          Petkovsek, is the same person as the patentee of Patent No.                 
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007