The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte EBERHARD KONIG, KALR-LUDWIG NOBLE
and THEODOR ENGBERT
_____________
Appeal 2000-0115
Application 08/922,8181
______________
Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER and GARDNER-LANE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
The appeal is from a decision of the Primary Examiner
rejecting claims 1-5. We affirm-in-part and reverse-in-part.
Application for patent filed 9 September 1997. Applicants claim priority under1
35 U.S.C. § 119 of German patent application 19637334.4, filed 13 September 1996. The
real party in interest is Bayer AG.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007